Aos Ambientalistas Democratas, Com Amor
Creditos: The People's Cube.
Comentario: This is really an inconvenient truth... Estou esperando o stick do Al Gore para colar nas janelas aqui de casa... Faca o que eu digo, mas nao faca o que eu faco, desde que o mundo eh mundo...
Obs1: eu (ainda) nao tenho uma SUV...
Obs2: leiam aqui sobre o jatinho da Pelosi...
Postagens
9 comentários:
Como diria a Ann Coulter: There was more energy consumed in the manufacture, construction and maintenance of Leonardo DiCaprio's Malibu home than is needed to light the entire city of Albuquerque, where there are surely several men who can actually act. But he has solar panels to warm his house six degrees on chilly Malibu nights.
Ah! Esses democratas!
Cara Patrícia
E você acreditou - sé é que assistiu – naquele bonita montagem de imagens e músicas apresentadas pelo Dr. Gore? Um cara que tem uma pegada ecológica de 12 hectares, 425% acima da média mundial, não pode ser o porta-voz do Aquecimento Global.
Um abraço,
Ricardo Safra, estudante de Geografia.
P.S. Em tempo, O S & M ( o cd do Metallica com a orquestra ) é realmente muito bom.
Hipocrisias daquele derrotado nas urnas...
Ele lembra um pouco o idiota do Michael Moore, que queria porque queria que o Bush fosse o culpado pelo 11/09 (9/11 por aí).
Mesmo assim, sou pró aumento do efeito estufa de carteirinha! afinal, está na scientific american! hua hua hua
Aliás, cara Patrícia
Leu as linhas da Scientific American - publicação de enorme prestígio nos EUA e no mundo, não vinculada a qualquer partido - que eu indiquei dois posts atrás?
Aí vão alguns trechos para você que só confia nos republicanos:
"The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these scientific findings on climate change, even as the global consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community, including the reports commissioned by the skeptical Bush White House. Thus, the hockey stick became the bête noire of the editorial page as well as of the dwindling 'climate skeptic' community, and right-wing Congressional officials such as Representative Joe Barton of Texas, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality, took up the attack."
E depois
"Reporters for the Wall Street Journal routinely distance themselves from the editorial page. Many of the paper's own reporters laugh or cringe at the anti-scientific posture of the editorials, and advise the rest of us simply not to read them. Nevertheless, the consequences of those editorials are significant. The Wall Street Journal is the most widely read business paper in the world. Its influence is extensive. Yet it gets a free pass on editorial irresponsibility."
E finalmente,
"As a neighbor to the paper at Columbia University, the Earth Institute has repeatedly invited the editorial team to meet with leading climate scientists. I've offered to organize such a meeting in any way that the editorial board would like. On many occasions, the news editors have eagerly accepted, but the editorial writers have remained safe in their splendid isolation."
Mas é isso aí, Patrícia. Abraçar uma causa é bem cool, e espero que esteja abraçando a causa certa. Se o WSJ em algum momento mudar de idéia você ficará firme na fé mesmo assim?
Catellius, eu respeito a NATURE e a SCIENCE. Essa ai nunca ouvi falar. Ja discordo de um trecho que vc ressalta: NUNCA HOUVE CONSENSO. 100% de consenso na comunidade cientifica... Conversa...
"has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community"
ninguém falou em 100%
Abraços
É preciso ter muito cuidado com essa coisa de exigir aos políticos comportamentos moralmente coerentes! É que pode começar a ser exigido os escrutinadres(eleitores) o mesmo comportamento!
J.
m.,
as i read in your call to WSJ, pelosi is quite offended by news which had been published saying she wanted (demanding?) to have an official plane at her doorsteps to take her home... that reminds me of a certain deputy in a certain country under the equator´s line who took the presidential plane to his small hometown while in president´s office for two days...
m.,
oops! a li´l correction to my last coment... it was not WSJ, but rather the washington times...
soooooorry!!!...
Postar um comentário